Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:04:24 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Derrick Edwards <dantavious@comcast.net> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64bit FreeBSD performance Message-ID: <20051130020424.GA62452@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200511292057.13225.dantavious@comcast.net> References: <200511292057.13225.dantavious@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 08:57:12PM -0500, Derrick Edwards wrote: > All, > I purchased a amd anthlon 64 3700 (754) to be used with VMWARE 5.5. FreeB= SD=20 > was going to be the guest OS. It seems that VMWARE only works with amd 64= bit=20 > (939). I was wondering if the performance gain of FreeBSD 64 bit really b= e=20 > significant compared to 32bit FreeBSD. Entirely depends on your application. > I was also wondering if all the ports=20 > for FreeBSD 64 running as 64 bit applications. Except for ports of precompiled i386 binary applications, they are all natively compiled (i.e. "64-bit"). Kris --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDjQioWry0BWjoQKURAs60AJ9a4BsanH0JwB9bOJpGAONG5pWmlgCfb9D2 UgzwNVv8chUW8DZXYGo/XzM= =+mbh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051130020424.GA62452>