Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:34:44 -0800 (PST) From: George Mitchell <george@m5p.com> To: jhb@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Compaq R3120US, was Re: ACPI + FIC VA-503+ = non-working fdc Message-ID: <200512010134.jB11YigV038775@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <200511281309.42200.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Well, the IRQs are the same for both. However, it is quite weird. With ACPI, > we see from your BIOS that your ppc0 device is using IRQ 5, and several PCI > devices are using IRQ 7 (include re0). Without ACPI, both the printer and > the PCI devices end up using IRQ 7 (this should _not_ happen). Try removing > the hints for ppc0 so it is probed by the PNP BIOS rather than via hints and > see if the IRQ moves from 7 to 5 for your non-ACPI case. Then, check to see > if you get the same timeout issues. You can also try going into your BIOS > and changing the LPT settings to use IRQ 7 rather than IRQ 5 as IRQ 7 is more > "standard". There were no ppc hints to change, so I reconfigured it in the BIOS to IRQ 7. (I'm sure I had a reason to configure it on IRQ 5 at some point long ago, but I don't remember why.) This did not change the behavior of the board. And at this point, I would just as soon run with ACPI disabled, since I don't know what I would gain by having it enabled. It's another story on another machine I havem where ACPI is working much better of 6.0-RELEASE than it had been under 5.4-RELEASE: a Compaq R3120US. I'm getting only three ACPI errors on this machine, whose dmesg output is at: http://www.m5p.com/~george/dmesg-6.0-R3120US.txt Should I try to do anything about these lines: acpi0: reservation of 62, 2 (4) failed acpi0: reservation of 65, b (4) failed acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (200.0C) or can I just ignore them? -- George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200512010134.jB11YigV038775>