Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:09:27 +0900 (JST) From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> To: gerald@pfeifer.com Cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GCJ/GIJ OOo status Message-ID: <20051210.130927.38702952.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0512040039200.92900@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <20051203.171107.74666553.chat95@mac.com> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0512040039200.92900@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0512040039200.92900@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote: > On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, NAKATA Maho wrote: > > I updated my blog entry and ask for your help. > > with gcc-4.1-20051125, in terms of compilation, there are a > > lot of improvements. However, gij seems to have a bug but gcj > > seems to work perfectly, i think this is a FreeBSD specific issue. > > Unfortunately, we'll have to disable the libjava builds with the next > update of the gcc41 port that I'm going to commit shortly since building > libjava now consumes insane amounts of memory. > > (See <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-12/msg00046.html>.) > > Can you also reproduce this problem, if you enable libgcj again? I checked with 20051209 version but coundn't reproduced. however this also happens with OOo with gij build. consume ~1G of memory at gcj-dbtools.. thanks -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051210.130927.38702952.chat95>