Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:16:01 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: David Gerard <fun@thingy.apana.org.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd Theme Song Message-ID: <20051210201601.GB79654@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <439B17CA.30309@thingy.apana.org.au> References: <20051210172500.58401.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <439B17CA.30309@thingy.apana.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:00:42PM +0000, David Gerard wrote: > Danial Thom wrote: > > --- David Gerard <fun@thingy.apana.org.au> wrote: > >>Danial Thom wrote: > > >>>I vote for > >>>"Look what they've done to my song, Ma" - a > >>>commentary on the destruction of the (formally) > >>>world's best operating system. > > >>So far I'm finding 6.x a heck of a lot better > >>than 5.x. The mousewheel > >>just works, a lot more of the ports just work, > >>sound works ... you still > >> have to fiddle with /boot/loader.conf to get > >>the sound to go, which is > >>completely braindead, but I'm sure it'll be up > >>to the standard of Linux > >>distros 2001. > > > I was referring to 4.x vs 5.x+ of course > > > Ah, of course! I agree. The thing you have to remember about Denial is that the ONLY THING he cares about in an OS is how fast it can route network packets. The major improvements in other areas of FreeBSD are of absolutely no interest to him, therefore the whole thing is a waste of time. But anyway, FreeBSD 6.0 is hugely superior to 5.4 and 4.11 in filesystem performance. I have been measuring this carefully for the past couple of months and hope to have the paper out soon. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDmzeBWry0BWjoQKURAmsxAJ9sRuMLkDhZ3A1OECa5GRVkRNg+6gCaAxv+ irrgAJZnXwKQlshxcpPeDjE= =DKl/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051210201601.GB79654>