Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:58:32 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> Cc: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de>, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: device drm with PCIe? Message-ID: <200512161358.34963.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1134757662.1404.81.camel@leguin> References: <43A1636A.6030108@mail.uni-mainz.de> <200512161230.41499.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <1134757662.1404.81.camel@leguin>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 16 December 2005 01:27 pm, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 12:30 -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Thursday 15 December 2005 07:36 am, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > Normally 'device drm' is only useable in conjunction with > > > 'device agp'. A lot of amd64 based boxes now use PEG slots for > > > their graphics accelerators. Is it possible to utilize 'drm' > > > with PCIe devices? > > > > Yes. It should work, at least in theory. ;-) > > > > > Does device agp has any effect on PCIe graphics accelerators? > > > > No. You don't need it for PCI-Express controller. > > Now, this is stuff I don't 100% understand, but what I've figured > out so far is that for graphics, you're going to need a GART > somewhere. For their PCIE cards, ATI deals with this by doing > essentially the old PCIGART method but tweaked, in lieu of AGP. > Intel's PCIE graphics, on the other hand, has a GART on their chips > that is basically the same thing as their previous AGP GARTs, at > least in terms of programming. So we expose their gart through the > agp device still, even though the chipset may be PCIE. Ah, Eric is correct about the Intel part. But it was amd64 thread, so I just assumed... :-( Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200512161358.34963.jkim>