Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:33:42 +0900 From: Eric Kjeldergaard <kjelderg@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: Standard way of updating 6.x ? Message-ID: <200602011133.53031.kjelderg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200602010156.57750.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> References: <bdf25fde0601310831qfda3239j8da895b74868e12@mail.gmail.com> <93676E29-4F0E-40DC-904C-225A859D0B78@u.washington.edu> <200602010156.57750.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2214806.sXrqPAjznh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Wednesday 01 February 2006 10:56=E3=80=81RW =E3=81=95=E3=82=93=E3=81=AF=E6= =9B=B8=E3=81=8D=E3=81=BE=E3=81=97=E3=81=9F: > On Tuesday 31 January 2006 17:45, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Xn Nooby wrote: > > > > portupgrade: Use for updating your actual ports programs. > > > > There may be a more elegant solution though and I would be more than > > happy to hear it too :). > > -Garrett > > I find that portmanager generally does a better job at keeping ports up to > date without manual intervention. A notable example being its ability to > upgrade Gnome without the help of a script. I also found portupgrade both more capable in many cases and more easy-to-u= se=20 (just portmanager -u to do what one "usually" wants to do). Too bad it was= =20 pulled from ports. =2D-=20 Emails appear more personalised with signatures. --nextPart2214806.sXrqPAjznh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD4B4QSMnO3Fce5JgRArJbAJ4iOCEudWmKRVwqpSgFXLbYsQOuGQCfezJO BXDQzAPhpcG6JqkBFSYqU0U= =qmG0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2214806.sXrqPAjznh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602011133.53031.kjelderg>