Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 05:09:49 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom <danial_thom@yahoo.com> To: ptitoliv <ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net>, Mathieu CHATEAU <gollum123@free.fr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bandwidth Problems with Freebsd 5.x Message-ID: <20060219130949.6162.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <43F76BA9.1000300@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- ptitoliv <ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> wrote: > Mathieu CHATEAU a écrit : > > >what about netstat -e on each host ? > >(looking for errors) > > > > > no errors detected > > >are you on swicthes ? > >Are the switches port on auto or forced ? > > > > > I don't know exactly : the servers are hosted > by a company. So I think > they are in autoselect mode. > > >when doing an ifconfig -a, are you in 100 full > duplex ? > > > > > Yeah and I tried to forced in all possibles > modes. (10/100 and half/full > duplex) > > >Are you using proftpd /wuftpd ? > > > > > Proftpd but I made some new tests with HTTP and > SCP and it is the same > problem. > > Regards, > ptitoliv It seems unlikely that he'd get good throughput in one direction if the link was hosed. One dropped packets and you're shot. The easy way to test this is to eliminate the switch..hook the Freebsd box directly to the linux box. DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060219130949.6162.qmail>