Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 06:02:26 +0300 From: Alex Semenyaka <flist@snark.rinet.ru> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> Cc: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>, hackers@freebsd.org, Alex Semenyaka <flist@jabberwock.rinet.ru> Subject: Re: world's toolchain & CPUTYPE Message-ID: <20060301030226.GA48831@snark.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060228081911.GB42213@ip.net.ua> References: <20060226155009.GB6435@comp.chem.msu.su> <20060226185721.GF42677@ip.net.ua> <20060228044520.GB35526@stupid.rinet.ru> <20060228081911.GB42213@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:19:11AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Isn't is reasonable to add corresponding optional functionality
> > into the buld process?
> No.
Why? :)
> > For example, if -DSTATIC_TOOLCHAIN (or
> > pick any other name) is set, then:
> > 1) build toolchain statically linked
> This is already the case (${XMAKE} has -DNO_SHARED).
Oh, great. Could we also add -DNO_MAKE_CONF then?
Or at least -DTOOLCHAIN_NO_MAKE_CONF :)
That's would be enough. Or do I miss something?
SY, Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060301030226.GA48831>