Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 06:22:49 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) Message-ID: <20060303192249.GC692@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20060303190329.34556.qmail@web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060302160958.GA2035@flame.pc> <20060303190329.34556.qmail@web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2006-Mar-03 20:03:29 +0100, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: >FWIW. I consider moving to subversion an upgrade, not really a drastic change, An alternative VCS may have technical advantages (atomic commits and versioned metadata are the two main ones) but unless it allows anyone to have a local copy of the repository and implements all the CVS read commands (checkout, diff, history, log, update) indentically to CVS then it's a drastic change. Changing the repository name, updating process or access process means everyone will need to update their private scripts. -- Peter Jeremy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060303192249.GC692>