Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Mar 2006 01:00:02 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Aluminium Oxide <orac000@internet-mail.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: portsupgrade cvsup refuse file aware?
Message-ID:  <20060311060002.GA40638@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <1142054372.14978.256358031@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References:  <1142054372.14978.256358031@webmail.messagingengine.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 03:49:32PM +1030, Aluminium Oxide wrote:
> Currently, proper use of portsupgrade relies on currency of pkgdb. pkgdb
> does not work without a complete ports tree. A complete ports tree is
> often much larger than a locale-specific installation requires, or is
> maintained, confined by the use of cvsup refuse files. This is a bit of
> a catch 22.
>=20
> How much better would it be, if pkgdb had a flag to permit the parsing
> of the refuse file, and honouring the ports tree resulting from cvsup as
> produced by it?
>=20
> Can we do this?

Not really, this has been discussed many times.

Kris
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEEmdhWry0BWjoQKURAii+AKDoePknb6mA4kcaJ//1h3020eFh5ACg9ryV
7GR8PKW4ltFWatnHQF/g4MA=
=nsms
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060311060002.GA40638>