Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:41:05 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 slower than i386 on identical AMD 64 system? Message-ID: <200603160741.05493.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20060315144558.118c584b.kgunders@teamcool.net> References: <200603140740.38388.joao@matik.com.br> <200603151754.27250.joao@matik.com.br> <20060315144558.118c584b.kgunders@teamcool.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:45, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > Also, you reported you were having memory related issues but I missed > any reply to my query regarding memory timings in BIOS. I've seen some > MB's ship w/1T and other aggressive timings enabled. I assume so > that they can get out of the box perf boost for those MS gaming > site reviews where stability takes a back seat to bleeding edge > performance. But these more aggressive timings can also cause stability > issues. I know and I remember that and did not answered because I wanted to check t= his=20 first than I forgot to answer, but the problem I have is certainly not memo= ry=20 related, it simply happened when having 4GB on the MB. Of course I do not use any kind of overclocking and the memory settings are= =20 default settings, On the MBs which support ECC I use it and otherwise I use= =20 correct dual-channel 1GB chips. The voltages detected seems to be correct = =20 and the powersuplies I used are good ones. Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603160741.05493.joao>