Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:18:46 -0500
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        Oleg Sharoiko <os@rsu.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, Andrey Beresovsky <and@rsu.ru>
Subject:   Re: Boot hangs on ips0: resetting adapter, this may take up to 5 minutes
Message-ID:  <200603241718.49362.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060325003610.J11600@brain.cc.rsu.ru>
References:  <20060215102749.D58480@brain.cc.rsu.ru> <200603241607.55075.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060325003610.J11600@brain.cc.rsu.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 24 March 2006 16:54, Oleg Sharoiko wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, John Baldwin wrote:
> 
> JB>> 345,000 interrupts from scpi0 seems high.
> JB>Yeah, I guess it might be.  It's smaller than the bge interrupt storm
> JB>number. :)
> 
> I just didn't let it generate that many interrupts. I send break sooner 
> than in bge case. :)
> 
> JB>Yeah, level/high seems weird.  Try setting either
> JB>'hw.acpi.sci.trigger=edge' or 'hw.acpi.sci.polarity=low' from the loader
> JB>to see if that makes your machine happier.
> 
> Ok. I will. As soon as I poweroff/poweron that box. I played with 
> different kernels and booted one which don't support breaking into DDB 
> from serial line. :(
> 
> I've found an interesting thread on netbsd mailing list. 
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-amd64/2006/03/
> With subject "Re: Bug in x86 ioapic interrupt code for devices with shared 
> interrupts?". May this relate to my problems?

Well, there is one possibly interesting patch for bge in there, (the
one from the linux driver) but I'm not sure if it would really help or
not.

-- 
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve"  =  http://www.FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603241718.49362.jhb>