Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:00:32 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com>
Cc:        DAve <dave.list@pixelhammer.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: Why are so many people using 4.x?
Message-ID:  <20060329200032.GA79386@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0603291148y5065754ag178e4dc7c9ee7986@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <200603281234.11850.satyam@sklinks.com> <4429A37D.2020500@pixelhammer.com> <20060328213953.GA2682@xor.obsecurity.org> <4429B479.7000408@pixelhammer.com> <20060328224340.GA4063@xor.obsecurity.org> <442ACFB2.70108@pixelhammer.com> <20060329183051.GA78889@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060329190517.GA79103@xor.obsecurity.org> <3aaaa3a0603291148y5065754ag178e4dc7c9ee7986@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 08:48:07PM +0100, Chris wrote:

> Well without a doubt 4.x is the fastest and most stable freebsd out of
> the 3.  The comment earlier where it just runs and runs is a good way
> of describing it.

6.x is faster at filesystem performance and other tasks.

> 5.x had a big performance hit and 6.x is noticeably faster but I have
> been experiencing weird lockups with 6.x and have reverted all but one
> of my servers back to 5.4 that were running 6.0 and they became stable
> again, we have one server running 6.1 prerelease which is more stable
> then 6.0 so I would rate 6.0 as a poor release, sorry but it only is
> stable under low load on every server I tried it on.=20

Sorry to hear that, can you point me to the PRs you filed so I can
take a look?

> Kris and others
> have you been testing 6.0 in server environments with things such as
> ddos attacks and thousands of concurrent connections, sustained heavy
> traffic ongoing for days etc, these type of things have caused 6.0 to
> just die on me.

Yes, and so have companies like Yahoo! who are so pleased with 6.x
that they are deploying it company-wide.

Kris
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEKudfWry0BWjoQKURAuRnAKCqX7HetXwpQlvwxxL5jwFfbeU7tQCgmgZF
SD73M5YnTcMwx+2Q6ukvxwg=
=h0W+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060329200032.GA79386>