Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:28:14 +0100 From: Ashley Moran <work@ashleymoran.me.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Ross Lonstein <ross-freebsd@lonsteins.com> Subject: Re: Wanted: Flash player for <browser_of_choice>.... Message-ID: <200604121528.14491.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <20060412141502.GA39355@beryl.lonsteins.com> References: <443BB35B.6050801@computer.org> <200604121137.32229.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> <20060412141502.GA39355@beryl.lonsteins.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 15:15, you wrote: > I forwarded this license issue to an engineer I know there. His > response was positive. We'll have to see how it goes with their > management and legal. Cool =46rom reading the license I got the impression they only really want to bl= ock=20 users from installing Flash on embedded devices (why I do not know...) - th= e=20 lawyers probably don't even realise FreeBSD exists. I doubt it was intente= d=20 as a positive exclusion of the OS. Ashley
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604121528.14491.work>