Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:36:30 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: deischen@freebsd.org Cc: victor@bsdes.net, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing dependencies on shared libraries Message-ID: <20060415.113630.81407700.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604141439280.3685@sea.ntplx.net> References: <20060414182846.GA702@pato.euesrg02.net> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604141439280.3685@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604141439280.3685@sea.ntplx.net>
Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes:
: On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
:
: > Hi,
: > I found that ldd doesn't report libc as a dependency on most (all?)
: > libraries:
: >
: > pato> ldd /usr/lib/libfetch.so
: > /usr/lib/libfetch.so:
: > libssl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (0x4816a000)
: > libcrypto.so.3 => /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (0x48198000)
: >
: > does anyone know why?
:
: AFAIK, it's being worked on. It's not just libc either, -pthread
: also has to start linking to libpthread.
We don't record libc dependencies into shared libraries right now. If
we did, that would create some problems and solve some problems. With
symbol versioning, it most likely will become moot, since we'll never
have to bump libc major version again...
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060415.113630.81407700.imp>