Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:20:38 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>, David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> Subject: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache Message-ID: <20060427032037.GA86693@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <444FA32F.2060209@rogers.com> References: <20060425090739.8470143f.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <005301c668ab$39c4c150$8b00a8c0@multiplay.co.uk> <444E8F8A.9030409@rogers.com> <17487.34074.833134.823847@canoe.dclg.ca> <444F8912.4010604@rogers.com> <00bd01c66946$6ce6f3a0$b5db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <444FA32F.2060209@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:43:27PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Steven Hartland wrote: > >IIRC AM2 is not a server solution just a client one the new server > >socket is significantly different. > > Its not a server/desktop thing, its a new socket that will allow AMD to > use DDR2 memory. It applies to both Athlons and Opterons. No! Socket AM2 is the DDR2 939-pin Athlon64 desktop replacement. Socket F(1207) is DDR2 the 940-pin Opteron server replacement. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060427032037.GA86693>