Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:00:34 GMT From: eugeny gladkih <john@drweb.com> To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: threads/94176: KSE: sigwait doesn't recieve SIGWINCH sent by pthread_kill() or kill -WINCH Message-ID: <200604271700.k3RH0Yp2063767@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR threads/94176; it has been noted by GNATS. From: eugeny gladkih <john@drweb.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, David Xu <davidxu@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: threads/94176: KSE: sigwait doesn't recieve SIGWINCH sent by pthread_kill() or kill -WINCH Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:50:59 +0400 >>>>> "AG" == Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> writes: AG> David, John, AG> maybe it would be beneficial to the general programmer public to add AG> something similar to the NOTES section of the following man page to our AG> man page for sigwait: AG> http://condor.wesleyan.edu/cgi-bin/man.cgi?section=2&topic=sigwait AG> Using the original example, it would mean adding something like the AG> following code to get the desired behavior: AG> void dummy_handler(int signum) AG> { AG> return; AG> } AG> void *thread(void* unused) { AG> struct sigaction sa; AG> sa.sa_handler = dummy_handler; AG> sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask); AG> sa.sa_flags = 0; AG> sigaction(SIGWINCH, &sa, NULL); AG> . AG> . AG> . why so stupid code should be presented in all software wanted just to wait the signal? :( sigwait'ed signal is not ignored one! we DON'T ignore it we DO wait for it. I'm afraid there is another problem with SIGTERM which will terminate process. am I right, yeah? -- Yours sincerely, Eugeny. Doctor Web, Ltd. http://www.drweb.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604271700.k3RH0Yp2063767>