Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:39:25 +0200 From: Milan Obuch <net@dino.sk> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vrf support in FreeBSD Message-ID: <200605091439.26549.net@dino.sk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0605090544100.24955@pop.ict1.everquick.net> References: <5EB31780BD297F46812C8F495FA08F620438CAE3@electron.jnpr.net> <4460207A.9050505@elischer.org> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0605090544100.24955@pop.ict1.everquick.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 08:00, Edward B. DREGER wrote: > JE> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:54:18 -0700 > JE> From: Julian Elischer > > JE> how do you want to select which table should be used? > > Ingress interface. > Sounds reasonable, one important point missing - packets locally originated/'destinated'. Other than that, fully acceptable. > Consider: 802.3ad, ECMP, FIB, multi RIBs (e.g., OSPF vs BGP weight), VRF > > I started working on all of the above late in 2003 on 4.x; the project > was shelved due to lack of interest and [other parts of] $job taking > priority. I haven't looked at 5.x or 6.x code, but 4.x certainly would > have benefited from an architectural overhaul. > Regards, Milan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605091439.26549.net>