Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:38:24 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: Dirk =?iso-8859-1?q?Thannh=E4user?= <dt@dtinnovations.com> Cc: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sound delay in i4b Message-ID: <200605150938.28035.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <E5B8828C-30ED-43EB-A264-2EA9983F00D9@dtinnovations.com> References: <0CDCE7F4-A7D2-4379-9560-516FFF3350C6@dtinnovations.com> <200605141518.33634.hselasky@c2i.net> <E5B8828C-30ED-43EB-A264-2EA9983F00D9@dtinnovations.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sunday 14 May 2006 22:57, Dirk Thannh=E4user wrote: > On May 14, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > > > Do you have SVN installed? > > yes i have. I checked out the version which included both, the i4b > and the chan_capi. Is ist possible that my version was to old? > I just did a new checkout. > Subversion says "Checked out revision 264." That should be the latest version. It was fixed in "Revision 257", which wa= s=20 after that I released Version 1.6.0 in April. > Are there any "cheap" HFC-4S cards out there for testing? There exist some developer kits, but they are not so easy to get a hand on.= =20 The only place I know that sales HFC-4S are: http://shop.beronet.com And maybe "http://www.junghanns.net/". > > I think that this also means that i am not able to run one card > (HFC-1S) in slave mode, getting the clock from the other to keep them > in sync without soldering. Yes. > For Voice over IP a huger delay might be ok. thats also my opinion. > but what about Faxing over ISDN. Here I think latency is an important > issue. (didn't test the CAPI Fax receiption, yet) =46axing works, but really you need to use line interconnect to get faxing= =20 working reliably. Or you can receive the fax in asterisk. That also works. =2D-HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605150938.28035.hselasky>