Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 May 2006 16:35:21 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Mark Kane <mark@mkproductions.org>
Cc:        Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, stable@freebsd.org, Rong-en Fan <grafan@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: quota and snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE
Message-ID:  <20060523203521.GA48061@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <44736E11.6060104@mkproductions.org>
References:  <20060523181638.GC767@dimma.mow.oilspace.com> <6eb82e0605231120q37224c6r3b25982f556bed72@mail.gmail.com> <447366AD.30203@rogers.com> <44736E11.6060104@mkproductions.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 03:18:25PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
> Mike Jakubik wrote:
> >Rong-en Fan wrote:
> >>On 5/23/06, Dmitriy Kirhlarov <dimma@higis.ru> wrote:
> >>>Hi, list.
> >>>
> >>>Some time ago quota and, AFAIR, snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE has deadlock
> >>>problems. What the current situation with this? I'm ready to test
> >>>patches, if needed.
> >>>
> >>>WBR
> >>
> >>IIRC, there are some quota and snapshots changes merged in
> >>6.1-STABLE after 6.1-RELEASE is releases. So I think you may want
> >>to try that.
> >
> >Thats correct. I have been meaning to test these, but not had the time=
=20
> >to do so yet. If you can, update to -STABLE and give it a test.
>=20
> I had a motherboard die in a server on Sunday. It is running FreeBSD=20
> 5.4-RELEASE and the only hardware they had to replace it with was an=20
> Athlon64 CPU and a motherboard with an ATI chipset. With that board and=
=20
> 5.4, it will only boot in Safe Mode, but then the hard drives are=20
> running at very slow speeds. It completely locked up earlier today and=20
> they had to do a hard reboot (with no errors on the screen or in=20
> /var/log/messages). My plan was to have them fully upgrade the server=20
> tonight to a new box (with the same Athlon64 and mobo with ATI chipset=20
> since that's all they have), and do a fresh install of 6.1-RELEASE=20
> because a very similar board with the same chipset was reported to work=
=20
> in 6.0.
>=20
> Every machine I have or work on runs FreeBSD, but this is the only one=20
> that needs quotas because it runs cPanel for customers. I am not sure=20
> all the details about the problems with quotas, so will running=20
> 6.1-RELEASE with quotas cause problems for sure? If so, any suggestions=
=20
> on what to do given my situation? Would 6.0 be any better? I'd like to=20
> have the latest version because doing updates properly remotely is=20
> difficult, but if it is not going to work then I may have to use 6.0 if=
=20
> that will work or figure something else out hardware wise.

If you use snapshots with your quotas, update to 6.1-STABLE.  If you
don't use snapshots, 6.1-R should be fine.  This was discussed in
excruciating depth a few weeks back, so please read the archives for
more.

Kris


--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEc3IJWry0BWjoQKURAriOAJ93Ir9r4Aj1Psqs+Nu9knYwzEBXTQCg9Mo9
rApEGpgHoAI9PBxCsri/0Ng=
=6prq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060523203521.GA48061>