Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 22:13:30 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com> Cc: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: portupgrade ideas page Message-ID: <20060607021330.GA11189@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <c21e92e20606061845g65e840eh1d64553d119e1b30@mail.gmail.com> References: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org> <20060606211113.GA7845@xor.obsecurity.org> <c21e92e20606061845g65e840eh1d64553d119e1b30@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:45:14AM +0800, Jiawei Ye wrote: > On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > >On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:48:05PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > >> Portupgrade ideas page was created on our wiki server: > >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/portupgrade > >> > >> I would like to hear your ideas, wishes and comments. > > > My biggest wish for portupgrade is to respect make knobs in > pkgtools.conf when deciding package dependancies. For example, > everytime I do "make fetchindex" or let portsnap rebuilt INDEX-7, > "pkgdb -F" will report that portupgrade depends on a non-existent > db40, while 'databases/ruby-bdb' => 'WITH_BDB43=yes' was set in > pkgtools.conf. If you use fetchindex, this is expected. If you build the index yourself, but have your customizations in pkgtools.conf, it is also expected. This is why you should use make.conf for your customizations. Kris --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEhjZJWry0BWjoQKURAjVbAKDhRo7r3S8Pmr3h6Qp7QtZZORVl/wCfQuy4 X8XmHcKqVos+H+IbZ12iyHk= =wypI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060607021330.GA11189>