Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:16:21 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Subject: Re: NOT installing the .la files Message-ID: <200606141616.21658.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <200606141809.05229.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <200606112110.39148@aldan> <200606141146.28185.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <200606141809.05229.lofi@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
середа 14 червень 2006 12:09, Michael Nottebrock написав: > Of such a buildtime error? No. Here's a line from an typical libtool > archive: > > # Libraries that this one depends upon. > dependency_libs=' -L/usr/local/lib -lz /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la -lm' > > libtool will use that verbatim during linking. I think, it will use that verbatim only if it detected the presence of libiconv.la earlier -- just as the literal "/usr/local" must be a configure-time setting. The libiconv-1.9.2_1 installed on this computer, for example, did not come with a libiconv.la. Yet everything seems to have built fine after it... Unless there is a convincing example of things breaking without an .la file, these should be deleted. We went through more trouble over pkg-comment files. -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606141616.21658.mi%2Bmx>