Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 11:15:26 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@mired.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, bob@tamara-b.org Subject: Re: A New FreeBSD Server Message-ID: <20060626111208.P77513@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <17565.37706.966913.737964@bhuda.mired.org> References: <449D8616.5040306@tamara-b.org> <17565.37706.966913.737964@bhuda.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Mike Meyer wrote: MM> The other constraint on swap is that if you want the system to save a MM> core dump if it panics, you need a device to dump on that's 64Kb MM> bigger than ram. That's one device, not all of swap. This is not quite true, as there always are some unused memory regions, hence you need not add 64k to RAM size. At least, I had no trouble using swap == RAM for last 5 years or so... Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060626111208.P77513>