Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:55:17 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@uni-mainz.de> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de> Subject: Re: openoffice support and other ports Message-ID: <20060627145517.GA61466@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <44A0FF9D.4010802@uni-mainz.de> References: <1151350344.40202.10.camel@triton.mcneil.com> <44A0380A.1000902@mail.uni-mainz.de> <20060626195820.GA78155@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <44A0FF9D.4010802@uni-mainz.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 11:51:25AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:39:54PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > >>Are they really AMD64 ports or do they still need some ia32-compat-tweaks? > >> > > > >Yes. > > > > All right, for those, like me, who are not as fast as others in sucking > in informations: > This means I do not need the 32-Bit compatibility-crap anymore? Probably, yes. However, I keep the 32-bit linux emulation for the occasion odd application, for example, acroread. Although xpdf is fast and rendered good looking docs, there are some convenient features in acroread. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060627145517.GA61466>