Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:13:44 +0200 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Gaspar Chilingarov <casper@mail.web.am> Subject: Re: Are there any beakage of linuxulator (on amd64)? Message-ID: <20060727131344.GA81122@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <200607251230.39953.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <44C39D7E.30102@mail.web.am> <200607241720.36606.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060725101729.GA13468@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <200607251230.39953.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > this thursday at work I'll try to provide some more info, what exaclty do you > > need? is what -DDEBUG prints enough? > > Probably. The changes in question were just in the linux semctl function, so you > really only need printf's for that function to figure out which case it is blowing > up one and why. soooo.... I checked the coredump and found this: 1) its not acroread what coredumps but bash binary (the binary used for the script) when I manually tried running the bash and "exec /bin/ls" etc. it worked I havent investigated further waht causes the coredump 2) I put printf() at the very begining of the linux_semctl() function and ran the acroread binary. The printf was not printed (ie. it didnt used the linxu_semctl function) 3) here is a outpuit od -DDEBUG compiled linuxolator and running of acroread (the first 3 lines are output of command line, it might be interesting to see the VA = 0x0) www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/linuxamd64 if you needed anything else tell me.. I am going to work this monday again roman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060727131344.GA81122>