Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@mail.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: disklabel differences FreeBSD, DragonFly
Message-ID:  <200607300656.k6U6udJt003335@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <20060727063936.GA1246@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <20060727122159.GB4217@britannica.bec.de> <20060727202528.GA14954@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <200607282236.k6SMaRlj089446@apollo.backplane.com> <20060729141313.GA43548@hades.panopticon>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

:
:* Matthew Dillon (dillon@apollo.backplane.com) wrote:
: 
:>     felt that 8 partitions is restrictive.  My main home server has 10
:>     and the main DragonFly box has 11.
:> 
:>     There is another solution for FreeBSD folks, however.  You *DO* have
:>     four slices to play with.   You can put a disklabel with 8 partitions
:>     in it on each one (for 32 total).  It isn't as convenient, but it does
:>     work.
:About `lack' of partitions - don't forget that labels can be nested.
:Just do `bsdlabel -w /dev/ad0s1e` - you'll get /dev/ad0s1ea.
:
:-- 
:Best regards,
: Dmitry                          mailto:amdmi3@mail.ru

    Oh, very cute!  A terrible hack if you ask me, but cute all the same!

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607300656.k6U6udJt003335>