Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 23:52:05 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>, Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: extract both bz2 and gz files from distfiles Message-ID: <20060807235205.6d95f549@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <1154985655.95608.8.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> References: <14817321@bsam.ru> <20060807183724.GA47899@xor.obsecurity.org> <16560673@bsam.ru> <20060807201203.GA84762@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <50488990@bsam.ru> <1154984178.95608.6.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20060807210603.GA85637@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <1154985655.95608.8.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> (Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:20:55 +0200): > So you prefer imposing yet another dependency on the user is less evil > than adding few lines of extra code in port Makefile? > > Interesting PoV. We're talking about 4.x. It's on the way out. So it's about increased complexity (own do-extract target) on the well supported systems, or about another dependency on the old and "we support it if it isn't a hassle" versions. For the linux ports Boris is needing this part, I vote for another dependency (like we have already with USE_GCC in other ports). Bye, Alexander. -- Robot priest: And so we commend Vladimir's remains to the earth: filings to filings, rust to rust. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060807235205.6d95f549>