Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 03:21:51 -0700 (PDT) From: "R. B. Riddick" <arne_woerner@yahoo.com> To: Alastair Watts <awatts@pett.com.au>, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gvinum behaviour on disk failure Message-ID: <20060828102151.94147.qmail@web30306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <44F2AE04.6030408@pett.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Alastair Watts <awatts@pett.com.au> wrote: > Am I missing something (perhaps data didn't get written to ad0, but then > shouldn't it have been in memory), or shouldn't gvinum have absorbed > this error and supplied the data from ad0? > > Or is this a known issue/bug? I searched but couldn't find a similar > reference on this list.. > Hi Alastair! Hi list! I say, did u consider migrating to gmirror or graid3? Or even graid5? ;-)) http://home.tiscali.de/cmdr_faako/geom_raid5.tbz (now it has all new and compile-able files, that compile correctly... Thanks to veronica (...) fluffles (...) net) As far as I know, gvinum is not so good supported and has a lot of dysfunctions/malfunctions and is just contained for people who want to stay with vinum... vinum isnt so good supported since R5.X... But I am sure that vinum was somewhen in R3/R4 a very good software-RAID-tool... I will never forget it... Bye Arne --- Arne likes "Kentucky fried movie" (here esp.: "United Appeal For the Dead") __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060828102151.94147.qmail>