Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:02:44 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@freebsd.org> To: Harpalus a Como <harpalus.como@gmail.com> Cc: miros-discuss@mirbsd.org, misc@openbsd.org, Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>, netbsd-users@netbsd.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of NetBSD Message-ID: <20060831110112.J82634@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <950621ad0608310654h78ae0023g346abd108815ae72@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060830232723.GU10101@multics.mit.edu> <98f5a8830608301731s2b0663e3g94b0bd32f8a06a78@mail.gmail.com> <c6d37fe0608310259k12fe629eve59e59042fcfdb4c@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.0608311312190.8977@odem.66h.42h.de> <950621ad0608310654h78ae0023g346abd108815ae72@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Harpalus a Como wrote: > I'm just a lurker on the OpenBSD list, but I think Charles is right about > Linux. The code is better then people give it credit for, and considering > it's vast popularity and what all it's accomplished, the "bazaar" model has > worked wonders. I'm not advocating Linux, I'm just pointing out that > considering where Linux is, where it's headed, who all is backing it, I > really don't see it stagnating or dying anytime soon. > > If I'm correct, that's also what Charles thinks NetBSD needs among other > things, to look at their model for inspiration. I agree. Just a stupid comment, but ... Linux is one kernel, multiple distributions ... BSD is, what, 4 kernels now? If we worked more together instead of as seperate camps, it might make things a bit easier, no? Put together a *BSD "core" ... representative from each camp and try and steer the *kernel* itself towards a more common BSD ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060831110112.J82634>