Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:06:56 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is IPSec NAT-T support? Message-ID: <20060904180515.V44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <d5992baf0609041059k6585725bhe9a39fbae27c40c1@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060905022120.19c6d62d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <d5992baf0609041024q111de4d6t606266cf48b2d67a@mail.gmail.com> <20060904172700.W44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <d5992baf0609041045s417548e9m732d1c4443a75702@mail.gmail.com> <20060904175127.F44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <d5992baf0609041059k6585725bhe9a39fbae27c40c1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote: > Maybe it is because I am including FAST_IPSEC? I have attempted to > build and use a NAT-T kernel on atleast 7 attempts now. Last of which > was a couple months ago. the patch only support kame ipsec. I guess that's the problem. Could you try it building with kame ipsec instead of fast_ipsec and let us know if that worked? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060904180515.V44392>