Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:20:28 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        "Edward B. DREGER" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ldconfig "skipping" libraries (6.1-R)
Message-ID:  <20060906192028.GA21278@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0609061902410.16519@pop.ict1.everquick.net>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.62.0609061902410.16519@pop.ict1.everquick.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:18:18PM +0000, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> Greetings all,
>=20
>=20
> I'd been going nuts trying to determine why I couldn't link against=20
> "libdb-4.4.so" and a few other libraries.  The ones in question didn't=20
> show up via
>=20
> 	ldconfig -r
>=20
> although their respective directories _were_ found.  (Yes, I even ran=20
> "ldconfig -R" for good measure.)  ldconfig seems to "skip" libraries not=
=20
> of the form
>=20
> 	m/.+\.so\.[0-9]+/
>=20
> i.e.,
>=20
> 	libfoo.so.1
>=20
> is found, but
>=20
> 	libbar.so
> 	libsnuzzlycat.so.5.5
>=20
> are not.
>=20
> Bug or feature?

Feature.

> Is this what I get for straying from ports/packages?=20
> ;-)

Probably.

Kris

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFE/x98Wry0BWjoQKURAsUZAKCLL+5wLH6dg7NSeUsL4dOPPbiQPwCg4nSp
KXlGGJBm5AnyocMvlhqPQBc=
=jWuL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060906192028.GA21278>