Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:28:48 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: "Intron is my alias on the Internet" <mag@intron.ac> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger <netchild@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 105930 for review Message-ID: <200609111528.49054.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <courier.4505B01B.00012841@intron.ac> References: <200609100956.k8A9uD0P094639@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060911193600.7ab43fb6@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <courier.4505B01B.00012841@intron.ac>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 11 September 2006 14:51, Intron is my alias on the Internet wrote: > Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > Quoting John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> (Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:45:52 -0400): > > > >> On Sunday 10 September 2006 05:56, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > >> > PROBLEMS: > >> > > >> > 1. Why does uma_zdestroy(9) print message like: > >> > > >> > Freed UMA keg was not empty (100 items). Lost 2 pages of memory. > >> > > >> > Does it represent any problems? > >> > >> It means a memory leak. > > > > Because this is verbatim from the submitter and I don't know if he is > > subscribed to perforce@, we should tell him about it... CCed. :-) > > > > Bye, > > Alexander. > > > > But I have ensure that calling to uma_zalloc() and calling to uma_zfree() > appear strictly in pair in my code. Even the simplest testing program > can still lead to this kind of warning message (uma_zfree() is just next > to uma_zalloc()): > > uma_zalloc(...); > uma_zfree(...); I've only gotten this message when I've leaked memory in a zone. Do you have an example self-contained kernel module that produces this? -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200609111528.49054.jhb>