Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:34:20 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: backyard <backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCL84 Build error Socket Tests Hang FreeBSD 6.1-Stable #6 Message-ID: <20060922013420.GA32796@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060922012952.79405.qmail@web83108.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060922011759.GA32442@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060922012952.79405.qmail@web83108.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:29:52PM -0700, backyard wrote: >=20 >=20 > --- Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: >=20 > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:11:52PM -0700, backyard > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > >=20 > > > I'm having trouble building tcl84. These issues > > did > > > not seem to exist until I updated the ports tree > > and > > > world the other day > > >=20 > > > Heres the basic stuff: > > >=20 > > > FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #6 Sun Sept 17 22:03:38=20 > > > is what uname -a spits out ports were updated > > right > > > before the system source update.=20 > > >=20 > > > make.conf has > > >=20 > >=20 > > > CXXFLAGS+=3D-O3 -fno-strict-aliasing > >=20 > > Don't do that, it can cause problems >=20 > can you be a little more specific? I was just using=20 > CXXFLAGS+=3D-O3=20 > before I thought the aliasing issues because of type > casting could cause issues and so -fno-strict-aliasing > was what you had to do to make optimization above > level 1 work rigt. At least thats what reading about > -fno-strict-aliasing seemed to get at with FreeBSD > specifically.=20 >=20 > should it be > CXXFLAGS+=3D > dafaulting to O2 with no strict aliasing? given my=20 > CFLAGS=3D-pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing Just use the defaults (which is currently the same as your CFLAGS). > > > MAKEOPTS=3D"-j5" > >=20 > > Don't do that, it can cause problems >=20 > I know doing=20 > make -j5 buildworld or buildkernel or just about > anything else would/used to puke things. But I haven't > seen any issues with MAKEOPTS doing that. Perhaps > until now? I know specifically make -j5 on the shell > would cause the build to skip the build and fail on > the install or skip the build of the objects and fail > on linking the uncompiled library. The base system is fine, but many ports of third party software fail to build (or the build misbehaves) with make -j. Kris --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFEz2cWry0BWjoQKURAkI4AKCvjek5WEWltKyl0Ksd89FZHWBBkACfdVed 0wiIJBu2Pw5OFFyomlpusT4= =geyR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060922013420.GA32796>