Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:55:18 +0200 From: Joerg Pernfuss <elessar@bsdforen.de> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch for IPSEC_NAT_T Message-ID: <20061013165518.103236c8@loki.starkstrom.lan> In-Reply-To: <20061013143201.GA21926@zen.inc> References: <25685948.1160744185756.JavaMail.root@web03sl> <20061013130256.GA10192@zen.inc> <ff64092b0610130727y3417027dr501c29677fa10ee2@mail.gmail.com> <20061013143201.GA21926@zen.inc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_7idAlmpxWClF.XHk3c.j1=N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:32:01 +0200 VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net> wrote: > I don't know what will happen if you define IPSEC_NAT_T, but not IPSEC > / FAST_IPSEC, guess it will generate the same thing as if you didn' > define IPSEC_NAT_T. Or it won't compile because some defines are missing, just like umass breaks without scbus. Joerg --=20 | /"\ ASCII ribbon | GnuPG Key ID | e86d b753 3deb e749 6c3a | | \ / campaign against | 0xbbcaad24 | 5706 1f7d 6cfd bbca ad24 | | X HTML in email | .the next sentence is true. | | / \ and news | .the previous sentence was a lie. | --Sig_7idAlmpxWClF.XHk3c.j1=N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFL6jeH31s/bvKrSQRAofdAJsH4APZZTNWCfFPIm4BgofzvN5jpgCfW4GU GXscqIf6c0X1jwLmRe297BU= =iCPy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_7idAlmpxWClF.XHk3c.j1=N--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061013165518.103236c8>