Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:54:07 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: RFA: link http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/ in docs Message-ID: <20061017205407.GB1019@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <104436491.20061017215049@rulez.sk> References: <20061016230035.GA10448@cvsup.sk.freebsd.org> <20061017125311.GH68213@gothmog.pc> <104436491.20061017215049@rulez.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006.10.17 21:50:49 +0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > Hello doc@, > > I would like to ask you people, what do you think about the following > change: > > This is a forwarded message > From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> > To: Daniel Gerzo <danger@freebsd.org> > Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2006, 2:53:11 PM > Subject: RFA: link http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/ in docs > > ===8<==============Original message text=============== > On 2006-10-17 01:00, Daniel Gerzo <danger@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Some people don't like removal of some 4.X and pre-5.3 things from > > our documentation especially in our handbook. They often say that > > it's hard to find the archive of our docs, therefore I think this > > change might be reasonable. What do you guys think? > > It's a good idea. I don't object to this change, but... > > Since this is displayed on *ALL* the HTML output pages, we might have to > ask freebsd-doc about this. Do you have an example of how this looks in the built HTML? My initial reaction is that while I think we should improve info on where to find old docs, most users don't need them, so adding this to alle pages might be a bit overkill... Hmm, and now I see that we actually already have a link at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ to the old docs... -- Simon L. Nielsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061017205407.GB1019>