Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:02:43 -0600 From: Bob Willcox <bob@immure.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SAS Raid - mfi driver Message-ID: <20061101210243.GG98766@rancor.immure.com> In-Reply-To: <4547DD7E.4030509@qbrick.com> References: <45470D95.5020801@qbrick.com> <ei7448$4rs$1@sea.gmane.org> <454718DD.8060108@qbrick.com> <45471ACC.2030604@fer.hr> <4547421D.2010206@qbrick.com> <45477FCC.9050901@qbrick.com> <ei8hus$jec$1@sea.gmane.org> <4547DD7E.4030509@qbrick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:34:22AM +0100, Fredrik Widlund wrote: > Yes, it forces writeback even when the controller has no BBU. Choosing > WBack itself will default back to WThru. It's dangerous, but I guess it > should be much less dangerous than using for example softupdates. I don't see how it could be *less* dangerous than using softupdates. Any loss of power while writing and it seems to me that you are going to be screwed w/o a BBU. [snip] -- Bob Willcox Possessions increase to fill the space bob@immure.com available for their storage. Austin, TX -- Ryan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061101210243.GG98766>