Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:47:52 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: ticso@cicely12.cicely.de, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: bootspi parameters Message-ID: <20061210234751.GI54209@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20061210.163600.1102529578.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20061208.085456.-1548240230.imp@bsdimp.com> <20061208161425.GU54209@cicely12.cicely.de> <20061210210127.GF54209@cicely12.cicely.de> <20061210.163600.1102529578.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 04:36:00PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20061210210127.GF54209@cicely12.cicely.de> > Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes: > : On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 05:14:25PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > : > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 08:54:56AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : I've found -DUFS1_ONLY in the boot2 Makefile. > : Sounds like I should newfs the media and restart... > > That would help a lot... I did that originally to make things fit, > but now that I've whacked a lot of the extra junk out of there we can > likely remove it... UFS1 vs UFS2 shouldn't make a big difference on SD I assume, so it's more to give newfs the right options. It's booting now - UFS1 was the last point. > Re 5MHz vs 30Mhz. I've had no reliability problems running at 30MHz > on two different boards (two instances of the KB9202, and 4 different > of our boards). Maybe there's a little noise introduced somehow > that's throwing things off... I will measure the signals once I find time. For now VLAN_MTU has higher priority. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de http://www.fizon.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de support@fizon.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061210234751.GI54209>