Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:39:49 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Juha Saarinen <juhasaarinen@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Let's use gcc-4.2, not 4.1 -- OpenMP Message-ID: <20061215043949.GA9381@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <b34be8420612141915k50612a15ma6f7efe3816839e3@mail.gmail.com> References: <20061213192150.CF83D16A417@hub.freebsd.org> <200612131711.50921.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <4580DFAB.3080601@FreeBSD.org> <200612140917.25523@aldan> <elrr0d$8g1$1@sea.gmane.org> <20061214183026.GA1532@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4581A3E3.9060807@samsco.org> <20061215015713.GA33730@dragon.NUXI.org> <45820F35.50802@samsco.org> <b34be8420612141915k50612a15ma6f7efe3816839e3@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:15:23PM +1300, Juha Saarinen wrote: > So... silly question perhaps, but does -CURRENT (world + kernel) build > with gcc 4.2 and -fopenmp? What about -STABLE and -RELEASE? > -fopenmp will be a completely useless option for world unless someone starts to sprinkle OpenMP compiler directives throughout /usr/src. I seriously doubt anyone will ever sprinkle OpenMP directives in kernel sources (ie., do you want to link your kernel with libthr or libpthread?). -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061215043949.GA9381>