Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:13:18 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Shaun Amott <shaun@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: fetch-recursive broken? Is this a ports issue or just a problem with the PostgreSQL port? Message-ID: <20061227161318.GA37308@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20061227102419.0a7cb6a5.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <20061226173950.0412f4bc.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20061227032400.GD2029@charon.picobyte.net> <20061227102419.0a7cb6a5.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:24:19AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Shaun Amott <shaun@FreeBSD.org>: > > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 05:39:50PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > > Why should the fetch-recursive target care what's installed? Hell, I just > > > want the distfile on the server so I can install it on other machines. > > > > I agree. Perhaps we should automatically set NO_IGNORE and TRYBROKEN for > > the fetch-recursive target. > > I'm getting lost in all the Makefiles trying to cobble together a patch > to submit. Anyone familiar enough with the ports tree to do so, or at > least point me in the correct direction? Bill, This will probably require the expertise of someone who's familiar with the Mk/bsd.port.mk framework. I can confirm what you're reporting, though (and have also wondered about it myself...) Also, does "make fetch" work (vs. "make fetch-recursive") ? -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061227161318.GA37308>