Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:33:13 +0200
From:      Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Cc:        vd@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, nivo+sender+0820bd@is-root.com
Subject:   Re: How to construct this port?
Message-ID:  <20061228203313.0752d58e@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <4594049E.2040404@mac.com>
References:  <4593AB3D.5090107@is-root.com> <20061228122828.GA8473@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20061228123616.GA8652@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20061228145728.4f13fa4a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <4594049E.2040404@mac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_t9YBA6ug./vJHKnvSAkUcW6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:53:34 -0500
Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> wrote:

 [ ... ]

> However, sometimes mail systems go down or block traffic for whatever
> reason: postmaster's job is a thankless task, and this was true even
> before spam and viral email appeared.  Nowadays, it's harder to get
> things mostly right (nevermind "perfect"), so postmasters make
> imperfect decisions because they are faced with undesirable tradeoffs.

Indeed :-(

However banning a hole country isn't a tradeoff in my book, it's just
plain [inset_the_word_here]. And sine it's giving a 5XX code there's
really no way to reach the person in question.
=20
> It has not been my observation that insisting people not make any
> mistakes commonly results in fewer mistakes being made, or much less,
> in zero mistakes being made.  :-)  Rather than try to insist they
> "are not allowed" to do something, I'd prefer to let people make
> their own decisions and learn which ones are mistakes.  YMMV....

The problem is that, IMHO, this kind of rejecting affects us all as I
think that being a port maintainer implies receiving and replying to
users' email.

I don't use any of the ports maintainer by Nils so I could not care,
but I think it's my responsibility as commiter to point out that this
is a mistake.

--=20
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

Fascinating, a totally parochial attitude.
		-- Spock, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8



--Sig_t9YBA6ug./vJHKnvSAkUcW6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFlA3pBX6fi0k6KXsRAlxCAJ9MqNj9jk9CarlkB8PzzZYCTGgF3ACfepMx
wQrPUm7Q+HSrWZ6vPdp0x0E=
=GMfT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_t9YBA6ug./vJHKnvSAkUcW6--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061228203313.0752d58e>