Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:05:34 +0100 From: Lothar Braun <mail@lobraun.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Emacs vs XEmacs: which to choose for plain console using? Message-ID: <200701041105.38404.mail@lobraun.de> In-Reply-To: <20070103194157.GA34860@host.my.domain> References: <20070103194157.GA34860@host.my.domain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1359007.nra3QRGB1C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Elisej, On Wednesday 03 January 2007 20:41, a@zeos.net wrote: > What are advantages and disadvantages of xemacs over emacs? > Which to choose for plain console using? Maybe http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/EmacsAndXEmacs can help you to understand the differences. There's also a small discussion= =20 about when to use Emacs and when to use XEmacs. But in your case you only have the possibility to use emacs. Only emacs is= =20 able to work on the plain console. Regards, Lothar --nextPart1359007.nra3QRGB1C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFnNFyOlpYSeF9JmYRAhGaAJ45wbfxMQj0n19vKEJTSORxOVRkLgCfQQiJ qV3xUUtg0w0B/bwMmcoLY4Q= =GZBo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1359007.nra3QRGB1C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701041105.38404.mail>