Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 06:50:52 -0600 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tuning PostgreSQL for bulk imports Message-ID: <200701080650.56113.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <499c70c0701072351k114119e5kc4d9864fcc651cd7@mail.gmail.com> References: <200701071301.27423.kirk@strauser.com> <enrnt5$9h6$1@sea.gmane.org> <499c70c0701072351k114119e5kc4d9864fcc651cd7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart2353249.rpLRAPlaiy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 08 January 2007 1:51 am, Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote: > Why did you choose PostgreSQL over MySQL 5.0.x? We value our data, ruling out MyISAM. PostgreSQL is much faster than InnoD= B=20 for many concurrent reads and complex queries. > Is the latest PostgreSQL release performance much better than MySQL > 5.0.x in RELENG_6 with SMP and 2 GB of ram now? This has been true for our workload for several years. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart2353249.rpLRAPlaiy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBFoj4w5sRg+Y0CpvERAmxiAJ9SnE7QeC7RVXrtFxcBlJtlYoR89wCdFCN/ 8aBPTBb9CJ7Sxv69ooEs6/Q= =0Xsd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2353249.rpLRAPlaiy--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701080650.56113.kirk>