Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:24:58 -0200
From:      JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br>
To:        "Peter N. M. Hansteen" <peter@bsdly.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Loosing spam fight
Message-ID:  <200701260924.59674.joao@matik.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <87ac074537.fsf@thingy.datadok.no>
References:  <8a20e5000701240903q35b89e14k1ab977df62411784@mail.gmail.com> <200701250828.50540.joao@matik.com.br> <87ac074537.fsf@thingy.datadok.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:18, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> writes:
> > all this methods are certainly useless, stay calm ok
>
> I fully sympathize with your need to rant, but in this context most of
> what you say is really quite beside the point.  Please read what the
> material at the links provided actually says.
>

the articles you linked show how to implement pf

like I said, for my understandings firewall implemention for spam fighting =
is=20
wrong

because you reject the message

unless you are the man of a corporate network you do have *NO* right to dec=
ide=20
which message your users receive or not. May be some *WANT* viagra offers a=
nd=20
others *WANT* a bigger penis

so the only correct decision is to filter spam and put it into a spam folde=
r=20
where the user can review it and decide by his own if want it or not

but may be, to change your opinion,  you need to loose a case being=20
responsible for some having a small penis and pay him his losses hihihihi,=
=20
100k/inch or something hihihi

laugh with me and have a good day :)


=2D-=20

Jo=E3o







A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701260924.59674.joao>