Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:13:33 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Chris Marlatt <cmarlatt@rxsec.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What about BIND 9.3.4 in FreeBSD in base system ? Message-ID: <20070130221333.GP892@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <45BFA1B3.9040000@rxsec.com> References: <001601c74428$ff9d54b0$ab76ed54@odipw> <45BEE27D.1050804@FreeBSD.org> <45BFA1B3.9040000@rxsec.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--AbQceqfdZEv+FvjW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-Jan-30 14:51:15 -0500, Chris Marlatt wrote: >Doug Barton wrote: >>plan to MFC it after 4 or 5 days. I am actually considering only >>MFC'ing it to RELENG_6 to help provide some incentive for those on 5.x >>to upgrade. > >One would assume that the release would be supported up until the EOL=20 >provided on freebsd.org of May 31, 2008. "Support" does not mean that new features and upgrades are automatically back-ported. Security fixes and some bug-fixes will be provided. If you want new features, you may need to upgrade (hence Doug's suggestion that not MFCing bind 9.3.4 to RELENG_5 is an incentive to upgrade to 6.x). --=20 Peter Jeremy --AbQceqfdZEv+FvjW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFv8MN/opHv/APuIcRAldOAJ4tMVRtqJKWKNabqNi+YtjBd6gJwgCeIOOE mhuE9Hc3qnB1KIGgWfzcVBI= =C6lZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AbQceqfdZEv+FvjW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070130221333.GP892>