Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 02:58:12 +0100 From: Ulf Lilleengen <lulf@stud.ntnu.no> To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Cc: clayton@bitheaven.net, le@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problems simulating gvinum raid5 rebuild Message-ID: <20070308015812.GA30713@twoflower.idi.ntnu.no> In-Reply-To: <45EF18C3.3070106@freebsd.org> References: <0B1A704D-A455-4741-BC11-A2019BFB4B22@bitheaven.net> <45EF18C3.3070106@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On ons, mar 07, 2007 at 08:55:47pm +0100, Lukas Ertl wrote: > Clayton F wrote: > > >Any suggestions? Is using 7 drives exceeding the number that gvinum > >raid5 will allow? Should I be labeling the drives differently? Is my > >method for simulating a drive failure/replacement flawed? Any help would > >be most appreciated! > > It's apparently a bug. I'm currently working on some improvements to > geom_vinum, and this will be addressed, too. This mess is because when reading the gvinum configuration on boot-time, none of the objects is actually bound together and registered within another when the drive_taste is run (The parser just creates the object. It does not bind anything together). The states is also not updated. I've already done some work on this, but I discovered more issues that need to be fixed. I'll try have a patch ready by tomorrow night. I also have several other fixes in the lulf_gvinum_bugs branch in p4 Lukas. -- Ulf Lilleengen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070308015812.GA30713>