Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:31:23 +0100 From: Olivier Houchard <mlfbsd@ci0.org> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: current to 6-stable merge plans/policy Message-ID: <20070322153123.GB79016@ci0.org> In-Reply-To: <46029B48.9000906@errno.com> References: <20070322092609.GA58744@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <46029B48.9000906@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:05:44AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: > John Hay wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > What are the ideas (policy) about merging the arm/ixp425/avila stuff > > to 6-stable? I see some arm stuff gets merged, but it does not look > > like everything? Is it just that people merge what they need? > > > > Just trying to get a feel for it. Up to now I have used 6-stable on > > our soekris and wrap boards, but we are probably going to use the > > Avila boards a bit more, so I was wondering if I should use -current > > or 6-stable on them. Up to now my Avila and ADI testing was done with > > -current, but I'm not sure if that is a good idea for boxes that will > > end up in rural areas far far away. Hmm. Not that I have seen a panic > > on the Avila boards, but they have gone through a lot less testing up > > to now. > > Not sure what's been missed. I see no reason not to MFC anything > arm-related unless it breaks code compatibility (and even there it's > unlikely there are 3rd party codes to worry about). > > Sam Hi John, Sorry for lack of answers, I really need to get back in the loop. Avila works fine in RELENG_6. Generally, MFC'ing arm stuff should happen more often. On an unrelated note, your changes (I think, maybe I should've had a closer look) seem to provoke an interrupt storm on ATA when there's no CF card inserted, I seem to remember it may be why we did some ugly stuff. Olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070322153123.GB79016>