Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:13:32 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: maintainer for upcoming linux-fc6 ports Message-ID: <20070324231332.wnz1k6xjkckk4wss@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <77867496@bsam.ru> References: <77867496@bsam.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (from Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:25:43 +0300)= : > Hi! > > > I'd like to public my intention according upcoming linux-fc6 > ports. All new ports initially will have /me as a maintainer. > When linux_base-fc6 (note: not when compat.linux.osrelease=3D2.6.16 > becomes the default at -CURRENT) becomes the default linux port those > infrostructure linux ports maintained by emulation@ ATM will get the > list name as a maintainer. This is hard to parse, but I think I got your intention. > Is it a right thing to do? Any recommendations? I don't object, but why? If you go this way, add a comment near the =20 maintainer line regarding this. And add a comment in pkg-descr (or =20 pkg-message?) that this port is for development purposes only ATM and =20 should not be used for daily work (or something like this). Bye, Alexander. --=20 There are more things in heaven and earth than any place else. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070324231332.wnz1k6xjkckk4wss>