Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 15:57:19 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: julian@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw add pipe broken? Message-ID: <200704011557.20518.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <200704011824.l31IOi46036471@lava.sentex.ca> References: <200704011107.22750.joao@matik.com.br> <200704011255.49740.joao@matik.com.br> <200704011824.l31IOi46036471@lava.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 01 April 2007 15:22, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 11:55 AM 4/1/2007, JoaoBR wrote: > >by all respect to Julians work but with ipfw broken and sunday fucked up > > ... > > > >kind of scaring when seeing "I have no time to check, I do it on tuesday" > >or "I need to do the userland ipfw too to add some new features, but, not > >today.." > >please do it all or don't do it, ipfw is an mature and essential > >part where we > >do not espect such sudden surprises in releng6 to happen > > I seriously doubt he intentionally meant to break it.... Accidents man sure not, no one said that > happen. Roll your sources back to Friday and you will be OK until yaya but essential and especially mature code should be tested before comitting= =20 changes I guess, I believe that ipfw wasn't tested before beeing hacked and= =20 comitted this time, and overall btw, there was an alert and reply to the=20 commit msg on cvs which then was politly ignored "until tuesday" ... luck=20 that it wasn't the bootstrap or something > its sorted out. Remember, its a best effort, not perfect effort project. sure, but when became perfect the honor is welcome as it comes for free whe= n=20 it went wrong ;) > > ---Mike > > Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200704011557.20518.joao>