Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:03:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Duane Hill <d.hill@yournetplus.com> To: Jeff Mohler <speedtoys.racing@gmail.com> Cc: Amarendra Godbole <amarendra.godbole@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com> Subject: Re: Tagging email subject line with something like [fbsd-questions] Message-ID: <20070425220220.J1379@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com> In-Reply-To: <a969fbd10704251351t36e0b1aeh3dd4afec3c25bb2e@mail.gmail.com> References: <294439d20704250627h60a5b5dcx49f4dd6b34c2caa1@mail.gmail.com> <462F5D64.4020105@dial.pipex.com> <a969fbd10704251351t36e0b1aeh3dd4afec3c25bb2e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Jeff Mohler wrote: > I dont think subject tagging is poor at all. > > whats poor is overly long poorly organized subject lines..but hey..[FBSDQ] > aint all that long. Then you get someone who either doesn't a) trim the subject or b) the client response as such: Re: [FBSDQ] Re: [FBSDQ] bla bla bla
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070425220220.J1379>