Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 20:04:27 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> Cc: x11@freebsd.org, kde@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] qt assumes /usr/X11R6 Message-ID: <200705062004.28475@aldan> In-Reply-To: <200705061816.52049.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <20070505163649.GA61199@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070505191734.GD21388@xor.obsecurity.org> <200705061816.52049.lofi@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 06 May 2007 12:16, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
= > Actually qmake just needs a version bump, it correctly patches
= > /usr/X11R6 to ${X11BASE} (except for the freebsd-g++34 script which we
= > dont seem to use), so it needs to redo this now that X11BASE is
= > changing. šflz has bumped this in git. šI am hoping we don't need to
= > also bump everything that uses qmake since nothing copies this
= > definition into its own files (which is the issue with .la files)
=
= Just bumping qmake should be fine, yes.
Does not this mean bumping it for ALL x11-ports?
Frankly, I find it to be a design flaw, that a change outside a port requires
version/revision bumps of the port itself...
Michael, if you are convinced, the bump is needed, please, do the honors...
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200705062004.28475>